Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John J. JACKLETS, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.
[And A Third-Party Action] Nab Construction Corp., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Simpson Metal Industries, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered April 9, 1999, as modified in an order dated April 28, 1999, denying a motion by fourth-party defendant Simpson Metal Industries, Inc. for an order dismissing the fourth-party complaint or, in the alternative, substituting NAB Construction Corp. as fourth-party defendant in place of Simpson Metal Industries, Inc., unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that the fourth party action is not deemed a declaratory judgment action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The accident underlying the fourth-party complaint occurred before Simpson Metal Industries, Inc's merger into NAB. According to Business Corporation Law § 906(b)(2), the liability of Simpson, the constituent entity after merger, neither ceased nor became impaired as a result of the merger. What is at issue in the fourth-party complaint is the liability, whether it be based in indemnification or contribution, of the constituent Simpson to another constituent, NAB, which is now the surviving corporation. Thus, there is no issue of equitable subrogation, as is argued. We therefore modify only to the extent of deeming the action not to be one seeking a declaration as to insurance coverage, but rather one seeking a determination of liability under a fourth-party complaint.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 30, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)