Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LOURDES O. and Another Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., William O., Respondent-Appellant. Fatima DeLos S., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, et al., Petitioners-Respondents.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about August 2, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject children upon a finding that he violated the terms of a suspended judgment, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The determination that respondent violated the conditions of the suspended judgment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Shawna DD., 289 A.D.2d 892, 894, 734 N.Y.S.2d 724 [2001] ), including his failure to work diligently to obtain suitable housing for himself and his children, and to attend individual therapy and his children's mental health appointments (see Matter of Aparicio Rodrigo B., 29 A.D.3d 351, 815 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2006] ). Lapses by the agency due to a transfer of the case from one agency to another did not relieve respondent of his responsibility to comply with the terms of the suspended judgment (see Matter of Jessica J., 44 A.D.3d 1132, 1133-1134, 843 N.Y.S.2d 708 [2007] ).
The circumstances presented do not warrant an extension of the suspended judgment for an additional year where respondent failed to demonstrate the “exceptional circumstances” required to extend a suspended judgment (Family Court Act § 633[b] ), and where the record establishes that further efforts to reunite the family would not be in the best interests of the children (see Matter of Rigoberto M., 18 A.D.3d 405, 795 N.Y.S.2d 581 [2005] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)