Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Steven M. ALEVY, doing business as Bankers Capital Realty Advisors, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Isaac UMINER, Defendant-Appellant, Ditmas Capital Realty LLC, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered March 27, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Isaac Uminer's motion to dismiss the breach of a written agreement, breach of an oral agreement and breach of fiduciary duty causes of action and the request for injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant had a contractual obligation not to disclose confidential information that he might have acquired during the course of his association with plaintiff, and he agreed to refrain, while working for plaintiff, from engaging in any activity, employment, or business arrangement that conflicted with plaintiff's interests. Construing the pleadings liberally and accepting the facts alleged as true (Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88, 614 N.Y.S.2d 972, 638 N.E.2d 511 [1994] ), the motion court properly found that the complaint states a cause of action for breach of a written agreement (see Minnelli v. Soumayah, 41 A.D.3d 388, 389, 839 N.Y.S.2d 727 [2007] ).
The complaint also states a cause of action for breach of an oral agreement, since, as the court found, the oral agreement did not modify the written agreement but was a separate, unrelated agreement and therefore not subject to General Obligations Law § 15-301 (see Rose v. Spa Realty Assoc., 42 N.Y.2d 338, 343, 397 N.Y.S.2d 922, 366 N.E.2d 1279 [1977] ).
As to the breach of fiduciary duty cause of action, plaintiff alleges that by the time defendant's employment was terminated, 12 years after he was hired, with no college education and no experience in the business of commercial mortgages, he was managing the day-to-day operations of the company and acting as its de facto chief operating officer. These allegations describe ongoing conduct between the parties that may give rise to a fiduciary relationship (see Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co., 241 A.D.2d 114, 122, 672 N.Y.S.2d 8 [1998] ).
The court properly declined to dismiss the prayer for injunctive relief.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)