Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAIHEEM M.S., etc., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sharon H., Respondent-Appellant, Children's Aid Society, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered January 30, 2008, which terminated respondent mother's parental rights to her two sons after a fact-finding determination that she had permanently neglected them, and transferred custody to petitioner and the New York City Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The determination of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to plan for her children's future (Social Services Law § 384-b[7]; see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ) by demonstrating the ability to address adequately their medical and emotional needs (see Matter of Antonia Mykala P., 52 A.D.3d 224, 225, 859 N.Y.S.2d 155 [2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 705, 866 N.Y.S.2d 609, 896 N.E.2d 95 [2008] ), or availing herself of parenting classes addressed to the special needs of one of them (see Matter of Elizabeth Amanda T., 52 A.D.3d 376, 860 N.Y.S.2d 515 [2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 714, 873 N.Y.S.2d 269, 901 N.E.2d 763 [2008] ). The fact that she completed some of the programs does not indicate, under these circumstances, that she properly planned for her children's return (see Matter of Wilfredo A.M., 56 A.D.3d 338, 868 N.Y.S.2d 180 [2008]; Matter of Violeta P., 45 A.D.3d 352, 845 N.Y.S.2d 278 [2007] ).
A preponderance of the evidence supports the determination that termination of parental rights to facilitate the adoptive process is in the best interests of both of these children (see Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d at 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). Jaiheem is in a stable and caring environment provided by foster parents with whom he has lived his entire life, while Shavar is in the home of foster parents with whom he has lived since 2006 and who have addressed his special needs (Matter of Wilfredo A.M., 56 A.D.3d 338, 868 N.Y.S.2d 180, supra; Matter of Angel P., 44 A.D.3d 448, 843 N.Y.S.2d 288 [2007] ). Both sets of foster parents wish to adopt, and there is every indication that they will continue to facilitate visits between the children after their adoptions (see Matter of Victoria Marie P., 57 A.D.3d 282, 283, 871 N.Y.S.2d 4 [2008] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 21, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)