Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JESSICA VICTORIA S., etc., a Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Rosangela DeS., etc., Respondent-Appellant, SCO Family of Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 13, 2006, after a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We note the order entered pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b excusing the agency from having to make reasonable efforts to reunite the child and respondent, that the motion therefor was not opposed by respondent and that no issue of diligent efforts is raised on appeal. The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including respondent's failure to separate from her husband, who she knew was an adjudicated child abuser. Respondent's claim that she was never advised to plan separately from her husband is refuted by the evidence (see Matter of Alexis S.D., 7 A.D.3d 359, 359-360, 776 N.Y.S.2d 287 [2004] ). A preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing shows that while respondent attended a parenting class and attended “some” counseling, her progress in eliminating the problems that led to the child's placement was insufficient to warrant a suspended judgment, and that adoption by the family with whom the child has lived since birth is in the child's best interests (see id. at 360, 776 N.Y.S.2d 287; Matter of “Baby Boy” S., 24 A.D.3d 161, 805 N.Y.S.2d 310 [2005] ). We have considered respondent's other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 08, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)