Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Sheron RUSSELL, Petitioner-Appellant, For a Judgment, etc., v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the NEW YORK CITY POLICE PENSION FUND, Article II, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe III, J.), entered August 2, 2000, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents' determination denying her application for an accident disability pension, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner, a police detective, was injured when her wheeled swivel chair, which she was rolling backward to plug in the cord for an electric typewriter, was stopped by a wire on the floor, causing petitioner and the chair to topple over. Such an occurrence is not so out-of-the-ordinary or unexpected as to constitute an accident as a matter of law (see, Matter of Starnella v. Bratton, 92 N.Y.2d 836, 839, 677 N.Y.S.2d 62, 699 N.E.2d 421; Matter of Hess v. Board of Trustees, 255 A.D.2d 163, 680 N.Y.S.2d 791; Matter of Rosenthal v. Board of Trustees, 252 A.D.2d 388, 675 N.Y.S.2d 350, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 801, 687 N.Y.S.2d 625, 710 N.E.2d 272). Accordingly, the denial of accidental benefits having been the result of a tie vote, the proceeding was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Hess v. Board of Trustees, supra ). No basis exists for disturbing respondent's determination that petitioner had not proved her claim that her injury was caused by the failure of the chair's backrest due to a loose screw.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 01, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)