Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM SERVED BY NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CONDUCT, 03B-BU-96-11-4529A and 03E-BU-97-07-3202A. Barbara Humphrey Watts, Justin S. White, Petitioners-Respondents, et al., Petitioner; New York State Department of Health Board for Professional Medical Conduct, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Intervenors.
Where, as here, there is a conflict between the order of Supreme Court and its decision, the decision controls (see, Matter of Edward V., 204 A.D.2d 1060, 1061, 614 N.Y.S.2d 348; see also, Wills v. Wills, 283 A.D.2d 1023, 1024, 723 N.Y.S.2d 920). In its decision, the court denied the petitions seeking to quash subpoenas issued by respondent and granted respondent's cross motion seeking to compel petitioners to comply with the subpoenas. The order, however, provides that petitioners shall comply with the subpoenas “with the exception that as to any materials felt by [them] to fall within some privilege from disclosure, said petitioners shall prepare and serve upon counsel for [respondent] a ‘privilege log’ in the form and detail required under CPLR § 3122(b)”. We agree with respondent that the order must be modified to conform to the court's decision (see, Wills v. Wills, supra, at 1024, 723 N.Y.S.2d 920; Pauk v. Pauk, 232 A.D.2d 386, 390-391, 648 N.Y.S.2d 621, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 982, 656 N.Y.S.2d 740, 678 N.E.2d 1356). In light of our decision, we do not reach respondent's remaining contention. Thus, we modify the order by vacating the provision permitting petitioners Barbara Humphrey Watts and Justin S. White to withhold information pursuant to CPLR 3122(b), denying their petitions in their entirety and granting the cross motion with respect to those petitioners in its entirety.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the provision permitting petitioners Barbara Humphrey Watts and Justin S. White to withhold information pursuant to CPLR 3122(b), denying their petitions in their entirety and granting the cross motion with respect to those petitioners in its entirety and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 15, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)