Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Craig D. McKERNAN, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. Howard SAFIR, etc., et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 8, 2000, which dismissed petitioner from his position as a police sergeant, unanimously modified, on the law, to award petitioner back pay for the period that his suspension exceeded 30 days, and the matter remanded to respondent for a determination of the amount of such back pay, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Joan Madden, J.], entered October 25, 2000), otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.
Substantial evidence supports the finding that petitioner, who admits to the charges that he used the Police Department's computer system to run license plate inquiries for purposes other than Department business, did so with knowledge that the person making such inquiries was involved in criminal activities (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193). Notwithstanding petitioner's many prior awards for police work, the penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness, particularly given that petitioner was also found guilty of failing to safeguard his firearm while off duty, and also in view of his prior disciplinary record (see, Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38-40, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280; Matter of Brinson v. Safir, 255 A.D.2d 247, 680 N.Y.S.2d 500, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 805, 689 N.Y.S.2d 707, 711 N.E.2d 983). We modify as above indicated, there being no response from respondent to petitioner's claim that the determination denies him back pay to which he is entitled under Civil Service Law § 75[3-a].
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 26, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)