Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Syamsunder K. PRABHAKARAN, etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered April 10, 2002, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Decedent tenant was murdered during business hours on the 19th floor of defendants' commercial building. Although plaintiffs seek to hold defendants accountable for this tragic occurrence on a lax premises security theory, there were no witnesses to the crime and there is no evidence as to the identity of decedent's assailant and, accordingly, no evidence that any failure by defendants to provide adequate premises security was causally related to decedent's demise.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 24, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)