Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taj RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered July 16, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted rape in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 years, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the plea vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Before sentencing, defendant, represented by new counsel, moved to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant alleged that, in an off-the-record conference, the judge had threatened to impose a maximum sentence of 15 years if defendant were convicted after trial. Such a threat, which goes beyond a description of the possible sentencing exposure, has repeatedly been held impermissibly coercive (see e.g. People v. Stevens, 298 A.D.2d 267, 748 N.Y.S.2d 589 [2002], lv. dismissed 99 N.Y.2d 585, 755 N.Y.S.2d 721, 785 N.E.2d 743 [2003]; People v. Sung Min, 249 A.D.2d 130, 671 N.Y.S.2d 480 [1998] ). Defendant's factual allegations were supported by the detailed affidavit of his former counsel as to the threat, which was not denied by the prosecutor alleged to have been present at the conference, or by the judge, who had “no recollection of ever issuing any threats.” The judge's only other contribution to the discussion was his assumption that in a plea bargaining session a “minimum 3 1/212 years to a maximum of 15 years” would have been a “fit subject” of discussion, and would also involve showing defendant a sentence chart.
It should be noted that nothing in defendant's plea allocution directly contradicted his current claims. While ordinarily such a claim would warrant a hearing (see People v. Glasper, 14 N.Y.2d 893, 252 N.Y.S.2d 92, 200 N.E.2d 776 [1964] ), at which the plea-taking judge would be called as a witness, in the circumstances presented, such a hearing would shed no further light. Left unchallenged is the former attorney's sworn assertion that the court threatened defendant with a 15-year sentence in the event of a guilty verdict. Defendant was entitled to withdraw his plea.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 07, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)