Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joey SUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John N. Byrne, J. at plea; John P. Collins, J. at sentence), rendered January 29, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 1/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly imposed the agreed-upon prison sentence without conducting a hearing after defendant concededly violated the conditions of his plea agreement by failing to complete a drug treatment program and had to be returned four months later after issuance of a warrant. Although defendant contested certain allegations made against him by the drug program, the court instead relied upon uncontested facts (see People v. Valencia, 3 N.Y.3d 714, 786 N.Y.S.2d 374, 819 N.E.2d 990 [2004]; compare Torres v. Berbary, 340 F.3d 63 [2d Cir.2003] ). Despite the opportunity afforded him at sentencing, defendant did not provide any satisfactory explanation for his failure to advise the treatment program or the court of his problems instead of absconding (see People v. Cruz, 15 A.D.3d 240, 788 N.Y.S.2d 853 [2005], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 852, 797 N.Y.S.2d 426, 830 N.E.2d 325 [2005]; People v. Watson, 272 A.D.2d 270, 708 N.Y.S.2d 392 [2000], lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 909, 716 N.Y.S.2d 650, 739 N.E.2d 1155 [2000] ). Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 22, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)