Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Debah SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered February 26, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to receive in evidence hospital records allegedly bearing on the mental condition of the person stabbed by defendant. Defendant claimed to have disarmed this individual, who had allegedly attacked defendant with a knife. Nevertheless, the mental condition of the purported assailant, who did not testify at trial, was irrelevant, under the facts presented, to defendant's defense of temporary lawful possession (see, People v. Banks, 76 N.Y.2d 799, 559 N.Y.S.2d 959, 559 N.E.2d 653; People v. Snyder, 73 N.Y.2d 900, 539 N.Y.S.2d 285, 536 N.E.2d 614; compare, People v. Chevalier, 220 A.D.2d 114, 644 N.Y.S.2d 508, lv. granted 88 N.Y.2d 997, 649 N.Y.S.2d 404, 672 N.E.2d 630). We find no violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 in connection with the timing of the People's disclosure of these records. As noted, the records were not exculpatory, and, in any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the timing of the disclosure.
We likewise conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion when it excluded expert testimony concerning the lack of uniqueness of defendant's nickname (see, People v. Taylor, 75 N.Y.2d 277, 288, 552 N.Y.S.2d 883, 552 N.E.2d 131).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 14, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)