INGRASSIA v. METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD (1997)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Christina INGRASSIA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: January 28, 1997

Before NARDELLI, J.P., and RUBIN, MAZZARELLI and ANDRIAS, JJ.

Philip J. Dinhofer, for plaintiff-respondent. William G. Ballaine, for defendant-appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered August 13, 1996, which granted plaintiff's motion to reargue a prior order, same court and Justice, entered March 13, 1996, granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing this action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 USC § 51 et seq.), and upon reargument, denied the motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's testimony at the examination before trial, that she “constantly” told defendant's supervisors of the threats that her co-employee directed at her, “report[ing] everything”, recounting the nature of those threats and specific violent incidents, created a triable issue of fact as to whether the danger that the co-employee presented to plaintiff was reasonably foreseeable.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network