Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Celin VALDIVIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J., at suppression hearing; Budd Goodman, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 22, 1994, convicting defendant of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 33 to 66 months and a fine of $2,500, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
The hearing court properly ruled that portions of a written consent-to-search that arguably might be considered statements were substantially consistent with the statements contained in the People's statement notice so that there was no violation of CPL 710.30(1)(a) by the People's failure to provide defendant with a copy of the written consent within 15 days of arraignment (People v. Cooper, 78 N.Y.2d 476, 484, 577 N.Y.S.2d 202, 583 N.E.2d 915).
According due deference to the hearing court's findings of fact and credibility (People v. Fonte, 159 A.D.2d 346, 552 N.Y.S.2d 623, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 734, 558 N.Y.S.2d 896, 557 N.E.2d 1192), the record supports the court's determination that defendant voluntarily consented to the search of the premises in question. Defendant voluntarily signed the written consent-to-search at a time when he was not in police custody or in any way restrained, and in fact made an independent choice to cooperate with the police (see, People v. Gonzalez, 39 N.Y.2d 122, 383 N.Y.S.2d 215, 347 N.E.2d 575).
Defendant's guilt was proven by overwhelming evidence.
We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing.
Defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 06, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)