Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of William HART, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, Andrew W. Goodell, County Executive, and Ronald Hall, Director of Chautauqua County Department of Central and Information Services, Buildings, Grounds and Office Services, Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)
Respondents appeal from a judgment that granted the CPLR article 78 petition and reinstated petitioner to his position as Deputy Director of the Division of Buildings and Grounds with back pay and benefits. We reverse and dismiss the petition.
The relevant section of the Chautauqua County Charter provides that the Director of the Department of Central and Information Services has “the power to appoint * * * deputies, assistants and employees of his department as may be necessary to implement the duties of his office” (Chautauqua County Charter, § 6.00; see also, Chautauqua County Administrative Code, § 6.00). To the extent that provisions of the Chautauqua County Administrative Code conflict with the Chautauqua County Charter, the Charter controls (see, Tormey v. La Guardia, 172 Misc. 1091, 1094, 17 N.Y.S.2d 388, affd. 259 App.Div. 802, 19 N.Y.S.2d 1019, affd. 284 N.Y. 607, 29 N.E.2d 929). Because the provisions of the Chautauqua County Administrative Code must be construed in a manner consistent with the intent and provisions of the Chautauqua County Charter (see, Chautauqua County Administrative Code, § 17.00), we construe the Charter and the Code to authorize the Director of the Department of Central and Information Services to appoint a deputy in his or her discretion. Thus, the issue of legislative equivalency does not apply (cf., Matter of Torre v. County of Nassau, 86 N.Y.2d 421, 633 N.Y.S.2d 465, 657 N.E.2d 486; Matter of Gallagher v. Regan, 42 N.Y.2d 230, 397 N.Y.S.2d 714, 366 N.E.2d 804).
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 07, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)