Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of JARRED R., a/k/a Jarred W., Elijah R., a/k/a Elijah W., Quinton R., Jason R. and Benjamin R. Yolanda R., a/k/a Lonnie R., Appellant; Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent.
Petitioner met its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that respondent, by reason of mental illness, is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for her children (see, Social Services Law § 384–b [4][c]; Matter of Hime Y., 52 N.Y.2d 242, 247, 437 N.Y.S.2d 286, 418 N.E.2d 1305). The court-appointed psychiatrist diagnosed respondent as suffering from multiple personality disorder and borderline personality disorder. He concluded that those conditions rendered her incapable of caring for her children to the extent that, if the children were returned to her, they would be in danger of becoming neglected (see, Social Services Law § 384–b [6][a]; Matter of Sunja S., 175 A.D.2d 132, 571 N.Y.S.2d 826, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 861, 576 N.Y.S.2d 219, 582 N.E.2d 602, rearg. dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 893, 587 N.Y.S.2d 910, 600 N.E.2d 637). The psychiatrist also testified unequivocally that respondent was not likely to improve significantly and that her inability to care for the children would continue into the foreseeable future (see, Matter of Pauline Y., 193 A.D.2d 686, 598 N.Y.S.2d 32; Matter of Omar B. [Diane S.], 175 A.D.2d 834, 573 N.Y.S.2d 301; cf., Matter of Jennifer HH. [Warren HH.], 193 A.D.2d 850, 597 N.Y.S.2d 515). Family Court therefore properly granted the petition and terminated respondent's parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 07, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)