Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shirley H. COOPER, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF Irving COOPER, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)
Supreme Court properly confirmed the report and recommendation of a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO) following a hearing that plaintiff is entitled to spousal support payments from defendant, the estate of her former husband. We thus affirm the judgment for arrears in appeal No. 2. We note that defendant's contention that continued spousal support is not required by the 1974 judgment of divorce after the death of the former husband is made for the first time on appeal and, in any event, contradicts defendant's position at the hearing before the JHO. We further conclude with respect to appeal No. 1, however, that the court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's application for counsel fees and costs. Plaintiff was forced to incur the fees and costs upon defendant's failure to pay the court-ordered spousal support since January 2002, and that support constitutes this elderly plaintiff's only income other than Social Security (see Able v. Able, 222 A.D.2d 1125, 635 N.Y.S.2d 898). We therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 accordingly, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the amount of reasonable counsel fees and costs to be awarded.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it confirmed the report and recommendation of the Judicial Hearing Officer be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ) and the order is modified on the law by granting the application for counsel fees and costs and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 14, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)