Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Phyllis TOOTE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Defendant-Respondent, Taylor & Son Distributors, Defendant, Pathmark Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. [And a Third-Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered December 9, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff customer in a fall on defendant-appellant supermarket's premises, insofar as appealed from, denied the supermarket's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that she tripped over cases of soda that were stacked on the floor of defendant-appellant's supermarket. It appears that at the time of the accident, the supermarket's shelves, in accordance with usual practice, were being “packed out” with soda by an employee of either defendant-respondent bottling company or defendant soda distributor. The supermarket moved for summary judgment, contending that it did not create the alleged dangerous condition and that plaintiff's deposition testimony, to the effect that she walked to the soda aisle immediately after entering the store and did not see any soda on the floor before falling, shows that she cannot establish how long the soda had been on the floor before she fell. The motion court correctly held that such testimony does not establish, prima facie, the supermarket's lack of prior actual or constructive notice of the soda on the floor (see Straus v. New Wah Fung Corp., 269 A.D.2d 140, 703 N.Y.S.2d 7), or that it may not be held liable for an independent contractor's negligence on the basis of the supermarket's non-delegable duty to keep the public areas of its premises reasonably safe (see Backiel v. Citibank, N.A., 299 A.D.2d 504, 507, 751 N.Y.S.2d 492; Atkinson v. Golub Corp. Co., 278 A.D.2d 905, 906, 718 N.Y.S.2d 546).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 04, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)