Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Duane READE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGHPOINT ASSOCIATES IX, LLC, Defendant-Respondent.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered May 13, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion for a Yellowstone injunction, declared plaintiff in violation of its lease, and granted defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting plaintiff's motion for a Yellowstone injunction and granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The sublease of part of the premises for use as a thrift shop did violate the use provisions of the lease, which prohibited, among other things, the operation of a “secondhand,” cooperative or “surplus” store, or a “discount” house, in the premises. However, plaintiff satisfied the criteria for the issuance of Yellowstone relief, having established that it held a commercial lease, received a notice of default, timely requested injunctive relief, and stated its preparedness and ability to cure the alleged default (225 E. 36th St. Garage Corp. v. 221 E. 36th Owners Corp., 211 A.D.2d 420, 421, 621 N.Y.S.2d 302). The readiness to cure was in the form of a notice of default that plaintiff issued to its subtenant, which threatened termination of the sublease unless the use violation were cured within five days. Clearly, the existence of the subtenant's business operation itself constituted the violation, and only termination of that sublease would satisfy the obligation to cure.
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 25, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)