Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward McCARTHY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J. at suppression hearing; Charles Solomon, J. at consolidation motion, nonjury trial and sentence), rendered July 30, 2002, convicting defendant of 15 counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348-349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility and identification.
The hearing court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. We similarly find no basis for disturbing the hearing court's credibility determinations (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380 [1977] ).
The court properly granted the People's motion to consolidate the indictments. The court properly permitted consolidation on the ground of overlapping evidence, pursuant to CPL 200.20(2)(b). Each of these pickpocketing incidents involved a distinctive modus operandi, consistently employed by a two-man team. The similarities in the crimes were such that the evidence of each was admissible as to the others (see People v. Beam, 57 N.Y.2d 241, 250-253, 455 N.Y.S.2d 575, 441 N.E.2d 1093 [1982] ). The court also correctly determined that, in any event, the larcenies were properly joined as legally similar pursuant to CPL 200.20(2)(c), and defendant failed to make a sufficient showing to warrant a discretionary severance (see CPL 200.20(3); People v. Lane, 56 N.Y.2d 1, 8-9, 451 N.Y.S.2d 6, 436 N.E.2d 456 [1982]; People v. Streitferdt, 169 A.D.2d 171, 176, 572 N.Y.S.2d 893 [1991], lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 1015, 575 N.Y.S.2d 823, 581 N.E.2d 1069 [1991] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 29, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)