Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GIOVANNI C., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about February 15, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of public lewdness, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Appellant's claim that Family Court's disposition is not supported by legally sufficient evidence is not preserved for our review, as his objection was not directed to the alleged error, (People v. Hines, 97 N.Y.2d 56, 62, 736 N.Y.S.2d 643, 762 N.E.2d 329 [2001] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Family Court's finding was also not against the weight of the evidence. “The determination of a Family Court Judge sitting as a trier of fact is to be accorded the same weight as that given to a jury verdict, and its determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record” (Matter of Willie W., 32 A.D.3d 479, 819 N.Y.S.2d 478 [2006]; see also People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495-496, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). Here, the record provides us with no basis to disturb the court's findings as to credibility.
Appellant's additional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, which involves matters that are dehors the record, such as his claims that his attorney did not interview potential witnesses, and did not meet with appellant prior to the hearing to prepare him to testify, are not properly before us on direct appeal (Matter of Robert P., 16 A.D.3d 512, 513, 791 N.Y.S.2d 614 [2005] ).
Finally, we find that the court imposed the least restrictive alternative disposition (see Family Court Act § 352.2[2]; Matter of Eliazar G., 4 A.D.3d 157, 158, 772 N.Y.S.2d 259 [2004] ) given appellant's admitted marijuana use, his poor grades, attendance and punctuality at school, and his prior arrest in Florida.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 12, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)