Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MALERBA, DOWNES & FRANKEL, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered June 23, 1998, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion to vacate a default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs had a lien for medical expenses reimbursed by them to one of their employees, who was represented by defendants in an underlying personal injury action. The parties to the present action entered into negotiations to compromise the lien at 50 percent. After settling the underlying personal injury action, defendants sent plaintiffs a check for 50 percent of the lien, less one-third for its counsel fees in connection with obtaining the 50 percent recovery. Plaintiffs thereupon commenced this litigation alleging, inter alia, conversion of the one-third, fraud and deceit under Judiciary Law § 487, and impairment of plaintiffs' subrogation rights and lien against the settlement.
On a motion to vacate a default, it is not necessary for a defendant to prove its defense, but only to set forth facts sufficient to make out a prima facie showing of a meritorious defense (Bergen v. 791 Park Ave. Corp., 162 A.D.2d 330, 570 N.Y.S.2d 940). Defendants, by asserting in evidentiary form that the parties had previously agreed to the presently disputed one-third reduction of plaintiffs' lien recovery, and by adducing arguable support for their contention that the law provides that they may recover in quantum meruit from the lien holder for recovering amounts subject to the lien, have met this burden and the action against them should be litigated on the merits.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 19, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)