Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William John FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered November 10, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life for the murder conviction, to run consecutively to concurrent terms of 8 1/313 to 25 years and 5 to 15 years on the remaining convictions, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly imposed a sentence for the murder conviction that was consecutive to the sentences for attempted murder and assault. Although defendant's first shot both killed the deceased victim and slightly wounded the surviving victim, defendant then moved closer to the assault victim and purposefully shot him, causing serious physical injury. This clearly constituted a separate and distinct act sufficient for the imposition of consecutive sentences (see, People v. Laureano, 87 N.Y.2d 640, 643, 642 N.Y.S.2d 150, 664 N.E.2d 1212; People v. Serrano, 256 A.D.2d 175, 684 N.Y.S.2d 1, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 878, 689 N.Y.S.2d 440, 711 N.E.2d 654). We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence in the interest of justice.
The court was not required to instruct the jury in the specific language requested by defendant with respect to its consciousness of guilt and alibi charges. In each instance, the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standards. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)