Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jerry GLENN, a/k/a Jeffrey Williamson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered July 13, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 1/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Upon observing the livery cab in which defendant was a passenger commit a traffic infraction, the police officers were authorized to stop the car (People v. Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413, 369 N.Y.S.2d 67, 330 N.E.2d 39). Since the validity of the stop is based on the objective circumstances and not the subjective intent of the police, it is irrelevant that the officers were motivated by their belief that a robbery was in progress (Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89; People v. Robinson, 271 A.D.2d 17, 711 N.Y.S.2d 384, lv. granted 95 N.Y.2d 968, 722 N.Y.S.2d 486, 745 N.E.2d 406; People v. McCoy, 239 A.D.2d 437, 657 N.Y.S.2d 437, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 928, 670 N.Y.S.2d 410, 693 N.E.2d 757).
There was probable cause to arrest defendant. The police officer observed about 50 small plastic bags, which, based on his experience, he knew were used to package illicit drugs, on the rear passenger seat within arm's reach of defendant. In addition, the officer had observed, as he approached the stopped car, movement by defendant suggesting that defendant was trying to distance himself from the bags. The totality of the circumstances, including the number of bags and defendant's furtive behavior, provided the police with probable cause (see, People v. Yancy, 86 N.Y.2d 239, 630 N.Y.S.2d 985, 654 N.E.2d 1233; People v. Heretakis, 210 A.D.2d 102, 620 N.Y.S.2d 44 lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 863, 624 N.Y.S.2d 382, 648 N.E.2d 802; People v. Ramos, 168 A.D.2d 359, 562 N.Y.S.2d 682 lv. denied 77 N.Y.2d 910, 569 N.Y.S.2d 942, 572 N.E.2d 625).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 30, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)