Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William GREENE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered December 22, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 1/212 to 9 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Upon realization that it had neglected to instruct the jury that it could request to see the exhibits, the court, after obtaining defendant's consent, properly directed a court officer to so instruct the jury. This simple communication with the jury was ministerial and devoid of substantive legal content, and thus did not constitute an improper delegation of judicial authority or a violation of defendant's right to be present (see, People v. Bonaparte, 78 N.Y.2d 26, 571 N.Y.S.2d 421, 574 N.E.2d 1027).
The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting defendant to comment in summation on the People's failure to call a “ghost” officer, while precluding him from inviting unwarranted speculation as to the testimony this officer might have given.
Defendant's contentions concerning the court's charge require preservation, and we decline to review these unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the court's charge, when viewed in its entirety, properly instructed the jury that the People had the burden of proving defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 30, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)