Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwin RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J. at suppression hearing; Mary McGowan Davis, J. at non-jury trial and sentence), rendered December 2, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 1/212 to 5 years and 1 1/212 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's motion to suppress his statement to the police was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. The hearing court correctly found that defendant's questioning was not custodial where defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the station, was not handcuffed, was left alone at the station house for a period of time unguarded and unrestrained, and was not subjected to lengthy, coercive or accusatory questioning. In sum, based on the totality of these factors, a reasonable person in defendant's position, innocent of any crime, would have believed he was free to leave the presence of the police (People v. Yukl, 25 N.Y.2d 585, 589, 307 N.Y.S.2d 857, 256 N.E.2d 172, cert. denied 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 78, 27 L.Ed.2d 89; People v. Walker, 181 A.D.2d 636, 582 N.Y.S.2d 108, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 1055, 584 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 596 N.E.2d 421; People v. Centano, 153 A.D.2d 494, 545 N.Y.S.2d 131, affd. 76 N.Y.2d 837, 560 N.Y.S.2d 121, 559 N.E.2d 1280). Moreover, since no promises or threats were made and defendant was not in custody, the deception employed by the police was not so fundamentally unfair as to render defendant's subsequent statements involuntary, or to deny him due process (see, People v. Tarsia, 50 N.Y.2d 1, 11, 427 N.Y.S.2d 944, 405 N.E.2d 188; People v. Williams, 272 A.D.2d 485, 708 N.Y.S.2d 875, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 873, 715 N.Y.S.2d 228, 738 N.E.2d 376; People v. Sullivan, 224 A.D.2d 460, 638 N.Y.S.2d 116, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 995, 649 N.Y.S.2d 402, 672 N.E.2d 628; see also, People v. Tarleton, 184 A.D.2d 463, 585 N.Y.S.2d 409, lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 910, 588 N.Y.S.2d 836, 602 N.E.2d 244). We also note that as soon as defendant began to incriminate himself, he received Miranda warnings.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 12, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)