Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John J. PRINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ITKOWITZ & GOTTLIEB, P.C., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered September 24, 1999, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and imposed a $5000 sanction against plaintiff for frivolous conduct, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 et seq., sanctions in the amount of $3,500, payable to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, are imposed against plaintiff-appellant's attorney, Salvatore S. Russo. The Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
Plaintiff is not entitled to compensation for his “services” to defendants attorneys as an insurance “expediter”. The services he rendered were the basis for his arrest and indictment on extortion charges, and constituted a fee-splitting arrangement contrary to public policy. “[I]t is the settled law of this State ․ that a party to an illegal contract cannot ask a court of law to help him carry out his illegal object, nor can such a person plead or prove in any court a case in which he, as a basis for his claim, must show forth his illegal purpose.” (United Calendar Mfg. Corp. v. Huang, 94 A.D.2d 176, 180, 463 N.Y.S.2d 497, quoting Stone v. Freeman, 298 N.Y. 268, 271, 82 N.E.2d 571). The $5000 sanction was properly imposed, there being no merit whatsoever to the action, which was brought primarily to harass (22 NYCRR 130-1.1[a]; [c][1], [2] ). By the same token, we find the prosecution of this appeal to be wholly without merit and brought to harass defendants-respondents. Accordingly, on this occasion, we impose sanctions against plaintiff-appellant's attorney to the extent indicated.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 09, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)