Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rodney ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J., at hearing; Gerald Sheindlin, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 4, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. While patrolling in an area with a very high incidence of cab robberies, at approximately 4:30 A.M., the police observed defendant hail a cab and then lean against the opened back door and engage in a heated argument with the driver. Defendant then pushed off the cab with one hand still on the roof as he reached inside his jacket where the officers could see a bulge. The driver immediately drove off at a high rate of speed, with the back door still open. When the officers approached defendant and asked him what had happened, he did not answer. In order to protect themselves, one of the officers touched the bulge in defendant's jacket and felt the weapon, which was then removed by the other police officer. Under the totality of these circumstances, the officers possessed the necessary reasonable suspicion to conduct the minimally intrusive, self-protective touch of the bulge to determine whether defendant was armed (see, People v. Moret, 240 A.D.2d 321, 659 N.Y.S.2d 445, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 908, 663 N.Y.S.2d 520, 686 N.E.2d 232; see also, People v. Taveras, 207 A.D.2d 306, 615 N.Y.S.2d 404, lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 940, 621 N.Y.S.2d 537, 645 N.E.2d 1237; People v. Clemente, 195 A.D.2d 300, 600 N.Y.S.2d 12, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 715, 602 N.Y.S.2d 812, 622 N.E.2d 313).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 16, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)