Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EMILY TOWERS OWNERS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CARLETON EMILY TOWERS, L.P., Respondent.
Order unanimously modified by granting defendant's cross motion in its entirety and remanding the matter to the court below for determination of the reasonable value of the attorney's fees, and as so modified, order affirmed without costs.
The Offering Plan, Proprietary Lease and By-Laws when read together evidence a clear intent to exempt the holdovers of “Unsold Shares” in the co-operative association from any increases in parking charges (see, Tompkins v. Hale, 172 Misc. 1071, 15 N.Y.S.2d 854, aff'd 259 App.Div. 860, 20 N.Y.S.2d 398, aff'd 284 N.Y. 675, 30 N.E.2d 721). Defendant is therefore entitled to attorneys' fees pursuant to RPL § 234 (see, North Star Graphics, Inc. v. Spitzer, 135 A.D.2d 401, 521 N.Y.S.2d 699, appeal dismissed, 72 N.Y.2d 841, 530 N.Y.S.2d 556, 526 N.E.2d 47).
MEMORANDUM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)