Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Edward PIRRAGLIA, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CCC REALTY NY CORP., Defendant-Appellant, Great Wall Chinese Restaurant, Inc., Defendant. [And a Third-Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered January 17, 2006, which denied defendant CCC Realty's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff firefighter sustained personal injury when he fell through an unprotected cellar door while responding to a restaurant fire at premises owned by CCC Realty. An out-of-possession landlord who reserves a right of entry in the lease in order to inspect the premises and make necessary repairs is deemed to have constructive notice of any existing statutory violations (see Guzman v. Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 N.Y.2d 559, 516 N.Y.S.2d 451, 509 N.E.2d 51 [1987]; Velazquez v. Tyler Graphics, 214 A.D.2d 489, 625 N.Y.S.2d 537 [1995] ). Applying this principle, it may reasonably be inferred that CCC Realty had constructive knowledge of the open stairway's condition.
The prevailing weight of authority establishes that Building Code (New York City Admin. Code) §§ 27-127 and 27-128 are proper statutory predicates for liability under General Municipal Law § 205-a (see Lynch v. City of New York, 14 A.D.3d 347, 787 N.Y.S.2d 308 [2005]; O'Grady v. New York City Hous. Auth., 259 A.D.2d 442, 687 N.Y.S.2d 352 [1999] ). Issues of fact exist as to whether the stairway at issue, providing access to the basement, violated these provisions. However, § 27-375(d) does not apply in this situation.
CCC Realty's argument of no basis for liability because the fire occurred after hours and plaintiff's presence in the non-publicly-accessible kitchen was unforeseeable as a matter of law is improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and thus not preserved for review (Murray v. City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 379, 381, 600 N.Y.S.2d 234 [1993] ). In any event, the contention is without merit.
We have considered CCC Realty's remaining arguments and find them without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 12, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)