Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David ERVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRONX LEBANON HOSPITAL CENTER, et al., Defendants-Respondents, The City of New York, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis J. Boyle, J.), entered January 9, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendants Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and Dr. Ramona Bailey Sunderwirth for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
No triable issue was raised as to whether defendants Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and Dr. Sunderwirth engaged in willful misconduct or were grossly negligent in making the disputed report of child abuse. Accordingly, since no grounds have been adduced upon which the Hospital and Dr. Sunderwirth's actions in connection with the child abuse report might be deprived of the qualified immunity conferred by Social Services Law § 419, summary judgment dismissing the claims against them predicated on the report was correct (see Rine v. Chase, 309 A.D.2d 796, 765 N.Y.S.2d 648 [2003]; Isabelle V. v. City of New York, 150 A.D.2d 312, 313, 541 N.Y.S.2d 809 [1989] ). Insofar as plaintiff's claims against Dr. Sunderwirth are premised on her grand jury and trial testimony, she is shielded by the common-law doctrine of absolute witness immunity (see Sykes v. James, 13 F.3d 515, 519 [1993], cert. denied 512 U.S. 1240, 114 S.Ct. 2749, 129 L.Ed.2d 867 [1994]; Storck v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 62 F.Supp.2d 927 [E.D.N.Y.1999] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 28, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)