Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DEREK C., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about January 3, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second and third degrees and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's findings were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that appellant, with intent to prevent a police officer from performing a lawful duty, caused injury to the officer (Penal Law § 120.05[3] ). There was a sufficiently direct link between appellant's continuous struggle to break free from the officer's hold and the officer's ensuing elbow injury, which occurred when the officer performed a tripping maneuver in order to subdue appellant (see e.g. People v. Morrow, 261 A.D.2d 279, 690 N.Y.S.2d 541 [1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1023, 697 N.Y.S.2d 582, 719 N.E.2d 943 [1999] ). As he felt his grip slipping on the struggling appellant, the officer warned appellant that he would have to “take him down” if the appellant continued to resist. The officer performed a tripping maneuver, which caused both the officer and appellant to fall, and resulted in the injury. Given the officer's warning to appellant, the injury was clearly a foreseeable result of appellant's own behavior.
The evidence also supported the finding that appellant recklessly injured the officer (Penal Law § 120.00[2] ). We have considered and rejected appellant's remaining arguments.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 04, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)