Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MICHAEL R. and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Victor T., Respondent-Appellant, Janice R., etc., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, etc., Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 14, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, determined, in child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, that respondent Victor T., a person legally responsible for the welfare of the subject children, had neglected said children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's neglect of the subject children was established by evidence showing that he stored heroin, which he intended to sell, in the family home and thus failed to exercise “a minimum degree of care” in his assumed role as a parental figure to properly supervise the children and act as their guardian (see Family Court Act § 1012[f]; Matter of Joey T., 185 A.D.2d 851, 587 N.Y.S.2d 356). Evidence at the fact-finding hearing established that respondent had hidden bundles of heroin in the children's hamper; that he packaged narcotics in the presence of one of the children, age nine; that he sold drugs from the family home to strangers; and that his drug-related activities in the home had led to his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Respondent's conduct, placing the children in near proximity to accessible narcotics and to the very dangerous activity of narcotics trafficking, posed an imminent danger to the children's physical, mental and emotional well-being.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 14, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)