Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gary D. HEPPNER and Judy L. Heppner, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. COUNTY OF NIAGARA and Donald H. Piedmont, Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.
Plaintiffs appeal and defendants cross-appeal from an order granting that part of plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligence and denying defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and those parts of plaintiffs' motion that sought partial summary judgment on the issues of serious injury and proximate cause. At oral argument, defendants withdrew their cross appeal from the order insofar as it granted that part of plaintiffs' motion with respect to negligence.
Judy L. Heppner (plaintiff) was injured on March 17, 1993 as a result of a collision with a vehicle driven by defendant Donald H. Piedmont, a Niagara County Sheriff's Deputy. Plaintiffs established their entitlement to partial summary judgment on the issues of serious injury and proximate cause by submitting the affidavit of plaintiff as well as numerous medical records and the affidavits of several of her treating physicians who averred that her injuries were caused by the accident. In response, defendants submitted affidavits of their experts concluding that plaintiff suffered no injuries in the motor vehicle accident of March 17, 1993. Defendants' submissions are sufficient to raise questions of fact on the issues of serious injury and proximate cause.
It is hereby ORDERED that said cross appeal from the order insofar as it granted that part of the motion with respect to negligence be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 18, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)