PATEL v. 303 FIFTH AVENUE INC (2000)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Manoj K. PATEL, Appellant, v. 303 FIFTH AVENUE INC. et al., Respondents.

Decided: April 20, 2000

Present: Hon. STANLEY PARNESS, P.J., Hon. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, Hon. PHYLLIS GANGEL-JACOB, Justices.

Manoj K. Patel, appellant pro se. Zraick Nahas & Rich, New York City (Robert Paul Rich of counsel), for respondents.

Order dated September 7, 1999 (Lucy Billings, J.) reversed, without costs, the direction that plaintiff post security for costs is vacated, and the matter restored to the Small Claims Trial Calendar.

The security for costs provisions of CPLR 8501(a), designed to assure that a prevailing defendant will be able to recover statutory costs from the plaintiff, are “unnecessary and inappropriate” (Meister v. Engine Trans. Corp., 138 Misc.2d 880, 881, 525 N.Y.S.2d 785) in the context of this small claims action since the defendant, if ultimately successful, “would not be entitled to have any costs taxed against (the) plaintiff.” (See, CCA 1901 [c].) It was thus error to require plaintiff to post security for costs as a condition of pursuing his small claim.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network