Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Steven A. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered on or about August 3, 1999, which granted defendant correction officer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action against him for intentional infliction of emotional distress, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that while confined to a jail under defendant's guard, defendant allegedly played an audiocassette within plaintiff's earshot that contained anti-Semitic statements. Assuming plaintiff's captivity was a circumstance that tended to make the alleged conduct something “ ‘more than mere insults, indignities, and annoyances' ” (Leibowitz v. Bank Leumi Trust Co., 152 A.D.2d 169, 181-182, 548 N.Y.S.2d 513), it remains that according to plaintiff's own deposition testimony, confirmed by defendant's testimony, defendant was not playing the tape with the intent of causing plaintiff emotional distress, but rather for his fellow officers to hear. Indeed, plaintiff could have avoided hearing the tape by moving to the back of the cell, but chose not to. In short, giving plaintiff's assertions every favorable inference, his captor-captive relationship with defendant was not so intimidating as to make defendant's conduct “extreme and outrageous” within the meaning of those words for purposes of a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (compare, Vasarhelyi v. New School for Social Research, 230 A.D.2d 658, 659-660, 646 N.Y.S.2d 795). However, nothing in this decision is to condone the actions of defendant in playing an anti-Semitic tape in a penal institution so that it could be overheard by prisoners and others.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 15, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)