Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BRITTANIA 54 HOTEL CORP., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Henry (a/k/a Hank) FREID, Defendant-Appellant.
Hank FREID, etc., Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRITTANIA 54TH HOTEL CORP., etc., et al., Counterclaim Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered January 13, 1998, which denied defendant's motion for an order pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 724 awarding him, during the pendency of the litigation, such reasonable expenses as are necessary in connection with his defense of the action, including attorneys' fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Section 722 of the Business Corporation Law permits a corporation to indemnify a past or present officer for his reasonable litigation expenses when he is sued by reason of the fact that he was an officer, i.e., for his actions taken as an officer. When a corporation declines to afford indemnification pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 722, the officer may apply to the court, which may direct that such payments be made “if the court shall find that the defendant has by his pleadings or during the course of the litigation raised genuine issues of law or fact” (Business Corporation Law § 724[c] ).
Defendant's submissions were insufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact regarding his assertion that he held the office of president or chief executive officer in plaintiff corporation, in light of compelling documentary evidence submitted by plaintiff establishing that defendant never was a corporate officer. In any event, the declaratory judgment action commenced against defendant was not brought “by reason of” the fact that he was an officer, or for any action allegedly taken by him as an officer. Accordingly, he did not qualify for a discretionary allowance by the court for his reasonable expenses in defending the action.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 04, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)