Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carol BRAIDER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. 194 RIVERSIDE OWNERS CORPORATION, Defendant, Kevin J. Quaranta, Esq., Nonparty Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered April 17, 1996, which, in a personal injury action, inter alia, held plaintiffs' motion to compel outgoing counsel to turn over their file in abeyance pending receipt of a Special Referee's report as to whether outgoing counsel was discharged with or without cause and as to the reasonable value of his services, unanimously reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, plaintiffs' motion granted and outgoing counsel directed to turn over plaintiffs' file upon payment to him of his outstanding disbursements and outgoing counsel granted a charging lien on the proceeds of this action, at the conclusion of which the trial court shall determine outgoing counsel's contingent percentage fee.
We find on the basis of the papers submitted before the IAS court that the outgoing attorney was discharged without cause. Contrary to the IAS court's conclusion that a factual dispute was presented, we find that plaintiffs' allegations attempting to justify counsel's discharge are largely conclusory and bereft of factual detail. In contrast, counsel's detailed accounting of his representation of plaintiffs over a period of approximately three and one-half years and the reason for his discharge went unchallenged. In such circumstances, a hearing was not required. Since the discharge was without cause, outgoing counsel is entitled to a charging lien on the proceeds of this lawsuit (People v. Keeffe, 50 N.Y.2d 149, 156, 428 N.Y.S.2d 446, 405 N.E.2d 1012), as to which his services were being performed pursuant to a contingency fee retainer. The determination of outgoing counsel's contingent percentage fee in the event of plaintiffs' recovery is reserved for the trial court at the conclusion of the action. (Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., 73 N.Y.2d 454, 457-458, 541 N.Y.S.2d 742, 539 N.E.2d 570.) Such lien adequately protects outgoing counsel's interests and he is directed to turn over plaintiffs' file upon payment to him of his outstanding disbursements.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 13, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)