Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kevin DEVLIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Rathe Productions Incorporated, et al., Defendants,
Nastasi White, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. STRUCTURE TONE, INC., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COYNE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, Empire City Iron Works, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered February 6, 1996, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against defendants owner and general contractor on the issue of their liability under Labor Law § 240(1), and granted defendant contractor's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's Labor Law claims as asserted against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
“It is well settled that the failure to secure a ladder to insure that it remains stable and erect while the plaintiff was working on it constitutes a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) as a matter of law” (MacNair v. Salamon, 199 A.D.2d 170, 171, 606 N.Y.S.2d 152). Whether the temporary platform on which the ladder stood was sturdy or not is an immaterial issue of fact that does not preclude summary judgment, there being no dispute that defendants failed to have someone secure the ladder or provide any safety devices (see, Guillory v. Nautilus Real Estate, 208 A.D.2d 336, 338, 624 N.Y.S.2d 110, appeal dismissed, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 881, 635 N.Y.S.2d 943, 659 N.E.2d 766). However, as against defendant subcontractor, plaintiff's Labor Law claims were properly dismissed in the absence of any evidence that the subcontractor had the authority to supervise or control the work plaintiff was doing (see, Russin v. Picciano & Son, 54 N.Y.2d 311, 318, 445 N.Y.S.2d 127, 429 N.E.2d 805; Iveson v. Sweet Assocs., 203 A.D.2d 741, 742, 610 N.Y.S.2d 382).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 25, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)