Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KOSTROMA, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, Also Known as Standard Chartered Bank PLC, Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered July 12, 1996, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order which, in an action for wrongful dishonor of a letter of credit, granted defendant issuing bank's motion to dismiss plaintiff beneficiary's complaint on the basis of documentary evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The requirement under the letter of credit that plaintiff produce packing lists “evidencing that the exterior of each carton shipped against this letter of credit shows in clear print the final destination” was not ambiguous, and plaintiff's noncompliance therewith warranted dismissal of the action. Assuming the admissibility of plaintiffs' experts' affidavits as to the information generally understood to be imparted by these packing lists in international trade circles, there is no merit to plaintiff's contention that the IAS court erroneously limited its focus to the diamond shaped information grids found under the “Marks and numbers” column of the packing lists. The court's attention was directed to such grids by the experts' own statements that “[t]he ․ final destination ․ expounded in the body of the Packing Lists ․ [is] reproduced under the marks and numbers column.” Since the record reveals, and as plaintiff now admits, that such information was not contained in the information grids, the motion court's conclusion that the documents failed to conform to the conditions of the letter of credit as a matter of law is fully supported.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)