Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey GREEN, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered August 11, 1998, as amended June 8, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years and 1 1/212 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's conviction of robbery in the second degree was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's use of force to retain the shoplifted property was established by evidence warranting the inference that at the time defendant pushed a security guard, the property was in the possession of defendant's accomplice, and that neither the accomplice nor the property had yet been brought under the control of the security guard's partner.
Defendant's contention that his right to a public trial was violated when the court held a portion of jury selection in the robing room requires preservation (see, People v. Pollock, 50 N.Y.2d 547, 429 N.Y.S.2d 628, 407 N.E.2d 472; People v. Valentin, 250 A.D.2d 497, 671 N.Y.S.2d 977, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 883, 678 N.Y.S.2d 30, 700 N.E.2d 568), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that it would not warrant reversal.
Defendant's challenge to the court's brief outline of the nature of the case (CPL 270.15[1][b] ) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the challenged comments, when viewed in light of subsequent instructions, did not deprive defendant of a fair trial.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)