NARDELLA v. GERUT (2007)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Donna NARDELLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Zachary Emanuel GERUT, Defendant-Respondent.

Decided: April 05, 2007

ANDRIAS, J.P., MARLOW, SULLIVAN, GONZALEZ, KAVANAGH, JJ.

Scarcella Law Offices, White Plains (John V. Henry of counsel), for appellant. Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP, White Plains (Patricia D'Alvia of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson S. Roman, J.), entered October 24, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendant's post-trial motion for a new trial on damages for future pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury award on that element from $200,000 to $20,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The result of plaintiff's nasal reconstructive surgery was cosmetically not to her satisfaction. The court found no medical support for future pain or difficulty in breathing. Reduction of damages for future pain and suffering was thus warranted because the amount awarded by the jury deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501[c] ).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network