Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the F. CHILDREN, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Blanca F., Respondent-Appellant, Ana F., et al., Respondents, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition (three papers), Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about April 14, 1999, placing respondent-appellant's three children with the Administration of Children's Services (ACS) for up to 12 months upon a fact-finding determination by the same court (Susan Larabee, J.), that the child Patty F., was abused and her sister, Galeann F., was derivatively abused by appellant and upon an order of the same court (Allen Alpert, J.), granting the motion for summary judgment by ACS finding that an after-born child, Denise F., was derivatively abused, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court's findings of abuse and derivative abuse are supported by the requisite preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Court Act § 1046 [b] ). The court's evaluation of the evidence and the witnesses' credibility is clearly supported by the record and will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Kathleen OO., 232 A.D.2d 784, 649 N.Y.S.2d 193). In less than a two-month period of time, in two separate incidents, Patty F., who at the time was one-year old, suffered a single fracture to her wrist and a double fracture to her arm. The medical findings were that the injuries were of such a nature as would not ordinarily be sustained or exist except by reason of the acts or omissions of the person responsible for the care of the child. Appellant failed to sustain her burden to offer a satisfactory explanation for the child's injuries (see, Matter of Kevin R., 193 A.D.2d 351, 352, 596 N.Y.S.2d 813, appeal dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 735, 602 N.Y.S.2d 794, 622 N.E.2d 294). The court was justified in rejecting appellant's testimony, which was inconsistent and contradictory.
The weight of the credible evidence before the court at the dispositional hearing supported its determination that it was in the children's best interests to be placed with ACS for up to 12 months, and, in this connection, it was proper for the court to consider whether appellant continued to deny responsibility for the child's injuries (see, Matter of Tanya M., 207 A.D.2d 656, 616 N.Y.S.2d 45).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)