Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph FILIPPONE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered September 25, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 year, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 19, 1999, which denied defendant's motion made pursuant to CPL 440.10(1)(g) to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's claim that the victim's testimony was inconsistent and undermined by plausible defense testimony raises issues of credibility that were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its determination (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94, 68 N.E. 112).
The motion to vacate the judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence (CPL 440.10[1][g] ) was properly denied. Contrary to defendant's assertion, a notation in a medical record made one year after the incident does not establish that the victim gave an account of the incident that was at odds with the testimony she gave at trial. This medical record fails to establish the source of the statement at issue, and thus cannot be attributed to the victim. Even if we were to consider defendant's argument, made for the first time on appeal, that this statement is inferentially attributable to the victim when read in context of another record, we would find that the records, read together, fail to support such an inference. We conclude that none of the medical records relied upon by defendant create a probability of a different verdict.
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)