Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert PEARSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. REDLINE MOTOR SPORTS, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents, Andrew S. Joyce, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered April 7, 1999, which denied defendant Joyce's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint as against him.
In this action for damages sustained as a result of a motorcyle-pedestrian accident, defendant Joyce moved for summary judgment on the basis that he was not the owner of the motorcycle when the accident happened since he had previously sold it to defendant Redline. Defendant's motion was unopposed by plaintiffs. Although the plates had not been surrendered to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) until the day after the accident, title may pass when a purchaser takes delivery whether or not registration occurs then (Horvath v. Lindenhurst Auto Salvage, 60 F.3d 120, 122, citing Pugh v. Hartford Ins. Group, 68 Misc.2d 1014, 1016, 328 N.Y.S.2d 872). Defendant's uncontroverted evidence established that transfer of ownership of the motorcycle happened prior to the date of the accident, which was sufficient to satisfy his burden of proof on the motion to dismiss (see, Dorizas v. Island Insulation Corp., 254 A.D.2d 246, 248, 678 N.Y.S.2d 388, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 810, 694 N.Y.S.2d 632, 716 N.E.2d 697).
Redline failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Redline admits that it purchased the motorcyle in July but is unable to identify the date and, further, is unable to produce any records of that or a claimed subsequent sale of the motorcycle. To defeat Joyce's motion, Redline was obligated to submit evidence that the parties intended title to pass at some later date. Redline failed to meet its burden of proof and Joyce's motion should have been granted (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)