Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application for Guardianship, etc., of FEMALE W., etc., Celina W., Respondent-Appellant, Little Flower Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about September 15, 1998, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing her custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services, following a fact-finding determination of abandonment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of abandonment is supported by clear and convincing evidence, namely, the testimony of the child's caseworker, that respondent had no contact with the child or the agency for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition. There is no reason to disturb Family Court's findings discrediting respondent's testimony concerning telephone contact she had with the agency (see, Matter of Jose Ramon V., 264 A.D.2d 661, 695 N.Y.S.2d 88). In any event, even if such testimony were to be credited, the alleged contact with the agency, considered together with the two contacts respondent had with the child's foster parent, were too minimal and half-hearted to preclude a finding of abandonment (see, Matter of Christopher Rene T., 189 A.D.2d 692, 592 N.Y.S.2d 384, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 709, 599 N.Y.S.2d 803, 616 N.E.2d 158). We find that termination of respondent's parental rights was in the child's best interests (Social Services Law § 384-b[3][i]; see, Matter of Atina C., 234 A.D.2d 997, 652 N.Y.S.2d 191).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)