Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Goldome, Plaintiff, v. 7 BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendants. Brookhill Management Corp., Defendant-Appellant, Kenneth G. Roberts, as Attorney, Non-Party Appellant, Kenneth S. Grossman, etc., Receiver-Respondent.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered November 15, 1999, in favor of the receiver and against defendant real estate management company in the amount of $119,623. 98, inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, sanctioning the management company's attorney in the amount of $3500, and bringing up for review the prior orders entered on or about August 26, 1999, January 4, 1999 and September 28, 1998, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
There is no statutory or other legal requirement that a turnover application under CPLR 6401(b), which provides that a court may authorize a receiver to collect and sell debts or claims, must be prosecuted in the form of a special proceeding. In any event, even if a special proceeding were mandated, the IAS court had jurisdiction over all necessary parties, including appellant management company, which had repeatedly appeared in the action, and therefore could convert the action, or simply deem it to be, a special proceeding (see, Port Chester Elec. Constr. Corp. v. Atlas, 40 N.Y.2d 652, 653-654, 389 N.Y.S.2d 327, 357 N.E.2d 983). We have considered appellants' remaining arguments, including that challenging the imposition of a sanction against the management company's attorney, and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)