Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CATHEDRAL PARKWAY ASSOCIATES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. RICHARD DONALD CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, P.C., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered August 24, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff contractor MZA Construction Corporation the total sum of $56,781.88, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The trial court properly concluded upon the trial testimony that plaintiff MZA had completed construction work for which it was to be paid $45,000 pursuant to the parties' contract. In reaching this conclusion, the trial court properly credited the testimony of Mr. Zoja, one of plaintiffs' principals, and discredited the testimony of the individual defendant that the monies entrusted to him were not intended to pay plaintiffs for their work. We see no reason to disturb the trial court's findings, particularly where, as here, such findings rest in large measure upon its assessment of witness credibility (see, Ashland Mgt. Inc. v. Janien, 190 A.D.2d 591, 593 N.Y.S.2d 790, affd. 82 N.Y.2d 395, 604 N.Y.S.2d 912, 624 N.E.2d 1007). Although defendant Richard Donald maintains that there was no basis to impose liability upon him individually, the trial evidence established that the checks provided to Richard Donald pursuant to the parties' contract were issued to Donald personally rather than the corporate defendant and endorsed by him in a personal capacity. Thus, his personal liability for the entrusted funds was established.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 30, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)