Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J. at speedy trial motion; Richard Carruthers, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 14, 1993, convicting defendant of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. Defendant expressly consented to the adjournments between May 15, 1992 and September 11, 1992, which were necessitated by his request that the People perform DNA testing, and there is no basis upon which to find this time includable (see, People v. Kopciowski, 68 N.Y.2d 615, 505 N.Y.S.2d 52, 496 N.E.2d 211). The period between February 22, 1993 and June 7, 1993, during which defendant's speedy trial motion was pending, was excludable. The record reveals that the length of this delay primarily resulted from the unavailability of minutes that the court directed the People to provide. Delays in the production of those minutes are not chargeable to the People because the court reporters are not within the People's control (see, People v. Holden, 260 A.D.2d 233, 234-35, 689 N.Y.S.2d 40, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1003, 695 N.Y.S.2d 749, 717 N.E.2d 1086; People v. Lacey, 260 A.D.2d 309, 311, 690 N.Y.S.2d 182, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1003, 695 N.Y.S.2d 749, 717 N.E.2d 1086). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 07, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)