Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Louis M. ROHRBERG (admitted as Louis Michael Rohrberg), a suspended attorney: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Louis M. Rohrberg, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent, Louis M. Rohrberg, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on May 24, 1978, as Louis Michael Rohrberg. At all times relevant to this proceeding, until May 1999, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (“the DDC”) moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 603.4(g), disbarring respondent on the ground that he has been suspended under 22 NYCRR § 603.4(e)(1)(i) and (iii) and has not appeared nor applied in writing to the DDC or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement within six months of the date of the order of suspension. Respondent has not submitted a response to this motion, although it was mailed to his home address by first class mail and certified mail return receipt requested.
Respondent was suspended from the practice of law until further order of the Court on March 28, 2000 [Matter of Rohrberg, 268 A.D.2d 180, 705 N.Y.S.2d 50], when this Court granted the DDC's unopposed motion based on uncontested documentary evidence that respondent commingled a client's settlement funds with his own funds and then misappropriated all of said funds in violation of DR 9-102(a) and (b); that he violated DR 1-102(a)(4), (5) and (7), by giving false deposition testimony concerning the misappropriation; that he failed to remit the funds to his client upon repeated demand in violation of DR 9-102(c)(4); and that he failed to pay his biennial registration fee.
Accordingly, the DDC's request for an order disbarring respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 603.4(g) should be granted and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Motion granted, respondent disbarred and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date thereof.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)